🚨 A Regulatory Reckoning in the Motor Insurance Industry
🧭 1. The Root of the Issue: From Liberalization to Loopholes
In April 2023, IRDAI removed product-specific commission caps for insurers and replaced them with a 30% overall Expense of Management (EoM) ceiling. While this was aimed at promoting flexibility and innovation, it unintentionally led to a surge in commission-driven competition, especially in the motor own-damage segment.
Auto dealers, operating as Motor Insurance Service Providers (MISPs), have been central to this shift. Many began prioritizing insurers offering higher commissions — sometimes even demanding a share up to 57% of the premium for bundling insurance with vehicle purchases.
“This kind of channel-driven distortion doesn't enhance consumer value — it just shifts margin battles to the distribution end,” said a senior insurance strategist.

📊 2. Validated Commission Data: A Clear and Rising Trend
IRDAI's latest filings and business media reports reveal stark numbers:
Metric |
FY23 |
FY24 |
Growth |
General insurers' commissions |
₹20,145 crore |
₹39,601 crore |
🔺 96% |
Life insurers' commissions |
₹42,218 crore |
₹51,524 crore |
🔺 22% |
Motor commission (OD policies) |
25–57% of premium |
Uncapped (post-reform) |
⚠️ Unchecked |
MISP-linked payouts (private insurers) |
₹4,890 crore |
₹16,578 crore |
🔺 239% |
Avg. motor commission ratio FY24 |
— |
21% |
🟥 Above 12–13% avg |
These figures confirm that:
-
Insurers are allocating an unsustainable share of premium income toward acquisition.
-
The motor segment has become the most aggressive battleground for over-commissioning.
-
Dealers have shifted power dynamics, prioritizing high-commission policies over consumer interest or long-term renewal value.
🌐 3. Global Comparison: Where India Lags
Country |
Commission Governance |
Transparency Level |
UK (FCA) |
Regulated; full disclosure of remuneration |
Mandatory written formats |
Singapore (MAS) |
Tiered caps for intermediaries; strict rules |
High |
USA |
State-level control; filings and disclosures |
Medium to High |
India |
EoM-based self-regulation; no mandatory disclosure |
Low |
India’s absence of mandatory disclosure norms allows intermediaries like dealers to operate without accountability — a gap being exploited.
🧑💼 4. Industry Behavior: Ethics vs Expediency
A. High-Volume Acquirers
-
Tie-ups with large dealer networks.
-
Use price-padding to absorb commissions.
-
Offer “pre-installed” insurance at the time of car sale.
B. Ethical Innovators
-
Self-regulate commissions under 20%.
-
Invest in digital channels (D2C apps, comparison platforms).
-
Offer no-commission/low-commission product variants online.
🚦Emerging Divide: IRDAI’s future regulation is likely to favor the second group, particularly post the launch of Bima Sugam.
👁️🗨️ 5. Consumer Impact: High Cost, Low Transparency
-
A customer buying a car worth ₹10 lakh might unknowingly pay ₹15,000–₹30,000 more due to bundled OD policy commissions.
-
Mis-selling often occurs via pressure tactics:
“Take our insurance or wait longer for delivery.”
-
Add-ons are sometimes duplicated (e.g., engine protection already included in manufacturer warranty).
📉 Result: Less trust, more complaints, and rising dissatisfaction with the insurance-buying experience.
🏛️ 6. IRDAI's Strategic Intervention
Though IRDAI has avoided heavy-handed regulation for now, it has:
-
Issued caution notices to insurers exceeding fair commission limits.
-
Audited dealer-linked intermediaries (MISPs) with high commission payouts.
-
Signaled willingness to impose sub-limits within the existing 30% EoM cap.
-
Accelerated the rollout of Bima Sugam to introduce a level-playing field.
🧠 The regulator is following a "watch and warn" strategy — but enforcement isn’t far if self-regulation fails.
🔍 7. What's Next in 2025?
Key Inflection Points to Monitor:
-
Will IRDAI mandate disclosure of commissions to end customers?
-
Will Bima Sugam shift power to digital-first insurers?
-
Will we see penalties imposed on OEM-insurer nexus practices?
-
Can consumer education bridge the awareness gap?
✅ 8. Calls to Action (Tailored by Stakeholder)
For Consumers
-
Always ask: “Is this insurance bundled? Can I choose my insurer?”
-
Use aggregators or insurer websites to benchmark premiums.
-
Compare policy details and claims track records — not just price.
For Insurers
-
Cap OD commissions internally at sustainable levels.
-
Publish product-wise commission bands voluntarily.
-
Prepare for Bima Sugam by improving digital servicing infrastructure.
For IRDAI & Government
-
Make commission disclosure mandatory at POS (similar to mutual funds).
-
Set automated limits on dealer-linked intermediary payouts.
-
Publish dealer-insurer tie-up reports to highlight risk concentration.
🧠 Final Thought: Reform or Regulation — The Window Is Closing
With commission payouts skyrocketing, insurer margins are compressing, customer costs are rising, and regulatory risk is escalating. The time to act is now — before the regulator has to bring down a hard gavel.
Transparency is no longer optional — it’s the only way forward.
Discalimer!
The content provided in this blog article is for educational purposes only. The information presented here is based on the author's research, knowledge, and opinions at the time of writing. Readers are advised to use their discretion and judgment when applying the information from this article. The author and publisher do not assume any responsibility or liability for any consequences resulting from the use of the information provided herein. Additionally, images, content, and trademarks used in this article belong to their respective owners. No copyright infringement is intended on our part. If you believe that any material infringes upon your copyright, please contact us promptly for resolution.