IRDAI Raises Alarm Over High Auto Cover Commissions
Brokerage Free Team •June 20, 2025 | 4 min read • 2529 views
Comprehensive tutorials, trading strategies, IPO analysis, and investment guides from industry specialists.
Brokerage Free Team •June 20, 2025 | 4 min read • 2529 views
In April 2023, IRDAI removed product-specific commission caps for insurers and replaced them with a 30% overall Expense of Management (EoM) ceiling. While this was aimed at promoting flexibility and innovation, it unintentionally led to a surge in commission-driven competition, especially in the motor own-damage segment.
Auto dealers, operating as Motor Insurance Service Providers (MISPs), have been central to this shift. Many began prioritizing insurers offering higher commissions — sometimes even demanding a share up to 57% of the premium for bundling insurance with vehicle purchases.
“This kind of channel-driven distortion doesn't enhance consumer value — it just shifts margin battles to the distribution end,” said a senior insurance strategist.
IRDAI's latest filings and business media reports reveal stark numbers:
| Metric | FY23 | FY24 | Growth |
|---|---|---|---|
| General insurers' commissions | ₹20,145 crore | ₹39,601 crore | 🔺 96% |
| Life insurers' commissions | ₹42,218 crore | ₹51,524 crore | 🔺 22% |
| Motor commission (OD policies) | 25–57% of premium | Uncapped (post-reform) | ⚠️ Unchecked |
| MISP-linked payouts (private insurers) | ₹4,890 crore | ₹16,578 crore | 🔺 239% |
| Avg. motor commission ratio FY24 | — | 21% | 🟥 Above 12–13% avg |
These figures confirm that:
Insurers are allocating an unsustainable share of premium income toward acquisition.
The motor segment has become the most aggressive battleground for over-commissioning.
Dealers have shifted power dynamics, prioritizing high-commission policies over consumer interest or long-term renewal value.
| Country | Commission Governance | Transparency Level |
|---|---|---|
| UK (FCA) | Regulated; full disclosure of remuneration | Mandatory written formats |
| Singapore (MAS) | Tiered caps for intermediaries; strict rules | High |
| USA | State-level control; filings and disclosures | Medium to High |
| India | EoM-based self-regulation; no mandatory disclosure | Low |
India’s absence of mandatory disclosure norms allows intermediaries like dealers to operate without accountability — a gap being exploited.
Tie-ups with large dealer networks.
Use price-padding to absorb commissions.
Offer “pre-installed” insurance at the time of car sale.
Self-regulate commissions under 20%.
Invest in digital channels (D2C apps, comparison platforms).
Offer no-commission/low-commission product variants online.
🚦Emerging Divide: IRDAI’s future regulation is likely to favor the second group, particularly post the launch of Bima Sugam.
A customer buying a car worth ₹10 lakh might unknowingly pay ₹15,000–₹30,000 more due to bundled OD policy commissions.
Mis-selling often occurs via pressure tactics:
“Take our insurance or wait longer for delivery.”
Add-ons are sometimes duplicated (e.g., engine protection already included in manufacturer warranty).
📉 Result: Less trust, more complaints, and rising dissatisfaction with the insurance-buying experience.
Though IRDAI has avoided heavy-handed regulation for now, it has:
Issued caution notices to insurers exceeding fair commission limits.
Audited dealer-linked intermediaries (MISPs) with high commission payouts.
Signaled willingness to impose sub-limits within the existing 30% EoM cap.
Accelerated the rollout of Bima Sugam to introduce a level-playing field.
🧠 The regulator is following a "watch and warn" strategy — but enforcement isn’t far if self-regulation fails.
Will IRDAI mandate disclosure of commissions to end customers?
Will Bima Sugam shift power to digital-first insurers?
Will we see penalties imposed on OEM-insurer nexus practices?
Can consumer education bridge the awareness gap?
Always ask: “Is this insurance bundled? Can I choose my insurer?”
Use aggregators or insurer websites to benchmark premiums.
Compare policy details and claims track records — not just price.
Cap OD commissions internally at sustainable levels.
Publish product-wise commission bands voluntarily.
Prepare for Bima Sugam by improving digital servicing infrastructure.
Make commission disclosure mandatory at POS (similar to mutual funds).
Set automated limits on dealer-linked intermediary payouts.
Publish dealer-insurer tie-up reports to highlight risk concentration.
With commission payouts skyrocketing, insurer margins are compressing, customer costs are rising, and regulatory risk is escalating. The time to act is now — before the regulator has to bring down a hard gavel.
Transparency is no longer optional — it’s the only way forward.
2 years ago • 17 min read • 41912 views
2 years ago • 10 min read • 36800 views
11 months ago • 9 min read • 34002 views
1 year ago • 6 min read • 30512 views
6 hours ago • 11 min read
1 day ago • 9 min read
2 days ago • 10 min read
Open your free account and access all market training modules.
Open Account Online →